When it comes to cutting down bureaucracy, Amazon’s CEO, Andy Jassy, is taking steps to keep the e-commerce behemoth agile and streamlined. In a recent internal memo uncovered by Business Insider, Jassy announced plans to boost the ratio of individual contributors to managers by a minimum of 15% by the close of Q1 2025. A move that could have significant impacts for Amazon’s staff structure.
This decision is rooted in Amazon’s culture of efficiency and a preference for fewer stakeholders having a say in decision-making. Jassy, in an internal call, expressed his disdain for bureaucracy, stating, “One of the reasons I’m still at this company is because it’s not a political or bureaucratic place.”
However, an Amazon spokesperson clarified to Fortune that the initiative is not necessarily an attempt to trim the number of managers. Instead, the intention is to reduce the layers between employees and leadership. A move that follows Amazon’s massive recruitment drive that took place during the pandemic.
To achieve this balance, Amazon is considering expanding team sizes and tasking managers with additional roles, according to the spokesperson.
As part of the effort to reduce bureaucracy, Amazon has introduced a “bureaucracy mailbox,” a platform for employees to voice their concerns about excessive processes or rules. Jassy has reportedly received over 500 emails, out of which about 150 have been acted upon.
The Pros and Cons of Increasing Employee to Manager Ratio: Experts Weigh In
Management experts agree that decreasing the number of managers, especially in a company as large as Amazon, can be a precarious move.
Moshe Cohen, a senior lecturer on management and organizations at Boston University’s Questrom School of Business, suggests that larger companies require some bureaucracy to manage and coordinate their operations. However, too much can hamper decision-making and distance employees from the company’s mission.
Loren Margolis, founder and chief executive coach of TLS Leaders and leadership professor at Stony Brook University, believes there are only two scenarios where Amazon should consider fewer managers. The first being underperforming managers, and the second, if the company needs to trim costs and increase agility.
Despite these conditions, Margolis cautions against reducing middle-management positions simply to cut red tape. She points out that eliminating middle managers could leave the company without crucial knowledge, as these individuals empower the front line and support the senior line.
For Amazon employees worried about their managers losing their positions, Margolis advises learning as much as possible about the company’s processes, key decisions, and influential leaders.
In Conclusion
As Amazon moves forward with its plan, it’s clear that the company is not only trying to reduce bureaucracy but also to improve efficiency and agility. However, the success of these changes will largely depend on how they’re implemented and the impact they have on the company’s overall operations. It will indeed be interesting to see how this decision plays out in the coming years.
With all these changes, it’s crucial for employees to stay informed and proactive. After all, as the old saying goes, “knowledge is power.”
Interested in staying updated with the latest business news and trends?
Sign up for our newsletter, CEO Daily – your weekday morning dossier on the news, trends, and chatter business leaders need to know.
Sign up here.
