As a local news reporter, I have observed the evolving dynamics of tourism over the years. A recent development that has caught my attention is the rise of anti-tourism sentiment in Europe, particularly in Spain. Europe has traditionally been a magnet for tourists, offering a myriad of experiences ranging from adventure, beach-side leisure, to historic tours. However, recent protests in Spain, where activists have targeted tourists with water pistols, have highlighted the growing resentment towards tourism in some parts of the continent.
Understanding the Growing Anti-Tourism Sentiment
The anti-tourism sentiment is not entirely new. Back in 1975, George Doxey developed the so-called “Irritation Index” (or “Irridex”) model, which suggested that as the number of tourists in a location increases, locals’ sentiment evolves from euphoria to apathy, irritation, and finally antagonism. This shift generally occurs due to a deteriorating quality of life among locals, such as when affordable housing becomes out of reach due to tourism-driven inflation.
City authorities have been responding to this sentiment by subtly curbing tourists through additional charges and caps on short-term rental facilities. However, this approach seems more reactive than preemptive.
Case Study: Barcelona
Take Barcelona for instance. This city was not a popular tourist destination until the 1990s when it hosted the Summer Olympics. Fast forward to today, and it is one of Europe’s most visited cities and the epicenter of recent tourism backlash.
As Richard Butler, emeritus professor in hospitality and tourism management at the University of Strathclyde, explains, “The main reason is the places that are experiencing overtourism are places that didn’t take measures to prevent it happening years and years ago.”
However, the blame for overtourism cannot be placed solely on the authorities or the visitors. Locals too have played a role. “One thing that tends to get forgotten in the overtourism clamor is that locals are a part of it. They have been, at some point, willing participants in this,” Butler told Fortune.
Towards a Sustainable Tourism Model
According to Butler’s Life Cycle model, a destination starts developing and growing to support many visitors once tourists discover it. Eventually, it hits a stagnation point as the tourist count peaks. From there, the city can choose to either decline in tourism or rejuvenate with more investments and attractions.
The current sentiment is not so much about tourists not visiting because it’s crowded but rather locals resenting it because it’s too crowded. This has led to discussions on whether tourism needs to stop growing altogether.
Butler believes that halting tourism growth could be viewed as a warning. Instead, there needs to be more dialogue to find a balance between the type of tourists residents are comfortable with and the need to keep the tourism industry economically viable.
“Tourism is a mixed blessing. It does bring all the money, it does bring disturbance,” Butler concluded.
Takeaways
- Anti-tourism sentiment is growing in some parts of Europe due to the negative impact of overtourism on locals’ quality of life.
- Authorities’ responses have been more reactive than preemptive, often involving additional charges and caps on short-term rentals.
- Locals, authorities, and tourists alike share responsibility for the current state of overtourism.
- There is a need for more dialogue to balance the interests of residents, tourists, and the tourism industry.
For more insightful articles on local and international news, subscribe to The Fortune Next to Lead newsletter. This newsletter is a must-read for the next generation of C-suite leaders, offering strategies, resources, and expert insight needed to claim the most coveted positions in business. Subscribe now. Sign up for free.
