In a landmark decision, a federal judge has sanctioned the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in connection with a lawsuit filed by the agency against Utah-based crypto company DEBT Box in July. The development has attracted significant attention after the accused company argued that the SEC misrepresented crucial details when it sought a temporary restraining order to freeze its crypto assets.
A Case of Misrepresentation
U.S. District Judge Robert Shelby ordered the SEC to clarify its actions, prompting the agency’s lawyers to acknowledge errors. Despite this admission, the SEC requested that Shelby refrain from issuing a penalty. This request was denied by Judge Shelby, who claimed the SEC had demonstrated “bad faith” conduct and was guilty of a “gross abuse of power”.
In a detailed 80-page document, Judge Shelby ordered the SEC to cover DEBT Box’s legal fees and costs relating to the restraining order. The judge further denied the SEC’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit without prejudice, which would’ve allowed the agency to refile the lawsuit at a later stage.
The judge was critical of the SEC’s actions, stating they had “substantially undermined the integrity of these proceedings and the judicial process”.
The DEBT Box Saga
DEBT Box, a lesser-known crypto firm, offers investment opportunities in the form of “node software licenses,” enabling customers to mine assorted digital assets. The SEC initiated legal action against the firm in July, alleging that the project had defrauded investors of almost $50 million by selling unregistered securities.
Before the case was unsealed, the SEC went to extraordinary lengths to request an ex parte temporary restraining order, a measure usually used when there’s a real possibility that the defendants may destroy evidence or attempt to flee the U.S. In this case, the SEC argued that DEBT Box was in the process of closing bank accounts and considering leaving the country.
However, the defense lawyers later highlighted that the SEC had misrepresented information in its application for the restraining order. Consequently, Judge Shelby demanded the SEC to provide evidence to support the restraining order.
The Fallout
Weeks later, the SEC admitted to making errors, with the enforcement chief, Gurbir Grewal, expressing regret over the “shortfall” in the case. However, the agency’s legal team requested Shelby to waive sanctions, claiming that its staff had not engaged in “bad faith conduct.” The SEC then attempted to dismiss the case without prejudice, arguing that it shouldn’t be subject to financial penalties.
The case quickly gained attention within the crypto industry and among sympathetic politicians who have voiced concerns over the SEC’s aggressive enforcement campaign against the blockchain sector under Chair Gary Gensler. This culminated in a group of Republican senators expressing their concerns to Gensler over the lawsuit in February, arguing that it had undermined trust in the agency.
Monday’s ruling by Judge Shelby is seen as a victory for DEBT Box and the SEC’s critics. The judge established that the agency knew the evidence it used to obtain the restraining order “lacked any basis,” yet it “advanced that evidence in deliberately false and misleading ways”.
The SEC has yet to comment on the court’s decision.
Stay updated on the latest developments in the world of crypto by subscribing to Fortune Crypto’s daily newsletter, bringing you all the latest on the coins, companies, and key players shaping the digital currency landscape. Sign up for the newsletter for free.
