As President-elect Donald Trump begins to assemble his cabinet, all eyes are on Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a former presidential contender and current ally. Speculations abound about Kennedy’s potential role, with whispers of nominations for key positions within federal health agencies — from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
While Kennedy’s official role remains unclear, one thing is certain: his influence could significantly shape the future of U.S. healthcare and health policy. Here are some insights from four health policy experts:
Fluoride in Drinking Water Could Be in the Crosshairs
Kennedy has repeatedly expressed concerns about the public health practice of adding fluoride to drinking water — a practice that has been shown to lower tooth decay in children by 35%. Despite studies and expert panels refuting a link between fluoride and adverse health effects, Kennedy believes fluoride should be removed from our water supply. However, public policy experts caution that this change is easier said than done, as fluoridation decisions are made by state and local authorities, not the federal government.
Vaccination Policies Might Be Influenced
As a well-known anti-vaccine advocate, Kennedy has stated his intention to change vaccine regulations and research. However, his claims, including the link between vaccines and autism, have been debunked by the scientific community. If Kennedy were in a position of authority over vaccines, there are concerns about the potential decrease in vaccine coverage and the subsequent increase in vaccine-preventable illnesses.
Potential Changes at the FDA
Kennedy has made his dissatisfaction with the FDA’s operations clear. However, even if he were appointed to a leadership position, experts believe it would be challenging for him to drive significant changes within the law-constrained bureaucracy of the FDA.
Food Policies Could Be Altered
According to Kennedy, he wants to move Americans away from certain food additives and promote healthier diets — including consuming more raw milk. Yet, the role of the secretary of agriculture, which Kennedy could potentially hold, is a complex one that requires balancing support for the agriculture and food industry with promoting healthy dietary habits.
While it’s reasonable to be concerned about Kennedy in a leadership role within a health agency, it’s essential to remember the system of checks and balances in place. Even if Kennedy is appointed to a high-level position, he cannot single-handedly change policy.
As we navigate through this ever-evolving political landscape, it’s crucial to remember the importance of science and data in guiding policy. Regardless of who holds the reins of power, facts and evidence should always be the cornerstone of our decision-making process.
